The SCICONX Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Biopharmaceutics (JPCB) relies on the expertise, integrity, and diligence of its reviewers to uphold the highest standards of scientific quality, ethical publishing, and constructive feedback. Reviewers play a crucial role in ensuring that all manuscripts meet rigorous academic and ethical standards before publication.

1. Role and Responsibilities of Reviewers

As a reviewer for JPCB, you are expected to:

1. Evaluate Scientific Quality:
   • Assess the novelty, significance, and relevance of the research to the field of pharmaceutical chemistry and biopharmaceutics.
   • Examine the methodology, experimental design, and statistical analyses to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.
2. Ensure Clarity and Coherence:
   • Review the manuscript for clear presentation, logical flow, and consistency in terminology.
   • Suggest improvements in structure, figures, tables, and references to enhance readability.
3. Check Ethical Compliance:
   • Verify that studies involving human participants or animals have proper ethical approval and adhere to international guidelines.
   • Identify any potential conflicts of interest, plagiarism, or data manipulation.
4. Provide Constructive Feedback:
   • Offer specific, actionable, and respectful comments to guide authors in improving their manuscript.
   • Highlight both strengths and weaknesses, ensuring feedback is balanced and professional.
5. Maintain Confidentiality:
   • Treat all manuscript content as strictly confidential and do not share with others.
   • Avoid using knowledge gained during review for personal or professional advantage.

2. Reviewer Guidelines and Workflow

1. Invitation to Review:
   • Reviewers receive an email invitation with manuscript details.
   • Accept only if the manuscript is within your area of expertise and there are no conflicts of interest.
2. Evaluation Criteria:
   • Relevance and Scope: Does the manuscript fit the aim and scope of JPCB?
   • Originality: Does the study provide novel insights or advancements?
   • Methodology: Are the experimental design, materials, and methods appropriate and reproducible?
   • Results and Analysis: Are results clearly presented and accurately interpreted?
   • Discussion and Conclusions: Are conclusions supported by evidence and contextually relevant?
   • References and Citations: Are references appropriate, current, and properly cited?
3. Review Report Structure:
   • Overall Recommendation: Accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
   • Confidential Comments to Editor: Provide insights not shared with the author.
   • Comments to Author: Offer detailed feedback with suggestions for improvement.
4. Timelines:
   • Submit reviews within the stipulated deadline to ensure a smooth editorial process.
   • If delays occur, inform the editorial office promptly.

3. Ethical Responsibilities

• Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest before accepting the review.
• Avoid reviewing manuscripts where personal, financial, or professional interests could bias your evaluation.
• Maintain integrity, professionalism, and objectivity throughout the review process.

4. Recognition and Contribution

JPCB values the dedication and expertise of its reviewers. Contributions are recognized by:

• Acknowledgment in annual reviewer lists (if agreed).
• Certificates of appreciation for active and high-quality reviewers.
• Opportunities to join the Editorial Board based on consistent performance and expertise.

5. Contact and Support

For any questions related to the review process, ethical concerns, or technical support, please contact:

Email: editor.jpcb@sciconxjournals.com
WhatsApp Number: +44 1528 360034
Website: www.sciconx.org/journal-of-pharmaceutical-chemistry-biopharmaceutics

JPCB relies on the expertise of its reviewers to maintain scientific integrity, quality, and impact. By providing thorough, unbiased, and constructive reviews, you contribute to advancing research in pharmaceutical chemistry and biopharmaceutics globally.