The Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (JNN) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scientific publishing. Peer review is at the core of our editorial process, ensuring that published articles are accurate, original, and valuable to the research community.

1. Overview

• JNN follows a double-blind peer review system, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other.
• Every manuscript is evaluated for scientific quality, originality, clarity, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal’s scope.
• The editorial team strives to ensure a fair, transparent, and timely review process.

2. Steps in the Review Process

a. Initial Screening

• Upon submission, manuscripts are checked for formatting, completeness, and adherence to the journal’s scope.
• The Editor-in-Chief or an assigned Associate Editor evaluates the manuscript for suitability before sending it for external review.
• Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards may be desk rejected at this stage.

b. Reviewer Assignment

• Suitable experts in the field are invited to review the manuscript.
• Each manuscript is typically evaluated by two or more reviewers.
• Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise, impartiality, and previous reviewing experience.

c. Double-Blind Review

• Reviewers assess the manuscript’s scientific rigor, novelty, methodology, presentation, and contribution to the field.
• Constructive feedback is provided to help authors improve their work.
• Reviewers recommend one of the following: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.

d. Editorial Decision

• The editor considers reviewer reports, the manuscript’s overall merit, and ethical standards before making a decision.
• Decisions are communicated clearly to authors, along with reviewer comments.

e. Revision Process

• If revisions are required, authors must respond point-by-point to reviewer feedback.
• Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by reviewers or directly assessed by the editor, depending on the extent of changes.

f. Final Acceptance and Publication

• Once accepted, manuscripts undergo copyediting, typesetting, and proofreading.
• Articles are published online with open access for global visibility.

3. Timelines

The journal strives to ensure a fair yet efficient review process:

• Initial Decision: within 2-3 days
• Peer Review Completion: 14-21 days
• Final Decision Post-Revisions: 5-7 days
• Online Publication: within 7–10 days of acceptance

4. Ethical Considerations

• JNN uses plagiarism detection software to ensure originality.
• Reviewers and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest.
• Research involving humans or animals must comply with ethical guidelines and include appropriate approvals.

5. Transparency and Integrity

• JNN is committed to providing a fair, unbiased, and constructive review process.
• Appeals or concerns regarding editorial decisions can be submitted to the editorial office for reconsideration.

✉️ Contact

For questions about the peer review process, please contact: editor.jnn@sciconxjournals.com