The Journal of Nephrology, published by SCICONX, upholds a rigorous and transparent editorial policy aimed at maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity, scientific accuracy, and ethical responsibility. This policy guides the editorial process from manuscript submission to publication, ensuring fairness, objectivity, and scholarly excellence.

✦ 1. Editorial Independence

The editorial team operates with complete independence and autonomy. Editorial decisions are made without influence from publishers, sponsors, or outside stakeholders, and are based solely on the scientific merit, originality, and relevance of the submitted work.

✦ 2. Peer Review Process

We employ a double-blind peer review process to ensure objectivity and eliminate bias:

• Reviewer and author identities remain anonymous.
• All submissions are evaluated by at least two independent experts.
• Final decisions are made by the handling editor, often in consultation with the Editor-in-Chief.

For full details, see our Peer Review Process page.

✦ 3. Manuscript Selection Criteria

Manuscripts are selected for publication based on:

• Relevance to nephrology and kidney-related research
• Scientific quality and methodological soundness
• Originality and innovation
• Ethical compliance
• Clarity, organization, and contribution to the field

Submissions undergo an initial editorial screening before entering the peer review phase.

⚖️ 4. Ethical Standards

We adhere to the ethical publishing principles set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to follow best practices in:

• Research integrity
• Human and animal rights
• Informed consent and privacy
• Conflict of interest disclosure
• Data sharing and reproducibility

Suspected cases of plagiarism, data fabrication, or unethical conduct will be investigated promptly and acted upon accordingly.

✦ 5. Author and Reviewer Responsibilities

• Authors must ensure that submitted work is original, accurately presented, and free from conflicts of interest or misconduct.
• Reviewers are expected to provide fair, objective, and timely evaluations while maintaining confidentiality and professional conduct.
• Editors must manage submissions transparently, avoid conflicts of interest, and base decisions on academic merit.

✦ 6. Appeals and Complaints

Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions. Appeals must be submitted with a clear rationale and will be reviewed by an independent senior editor. Complaints regarding editorial handling or ethical concerns are taken seriously and investigated confidentially.

✦ 7. Data Availability and Reproducibility

Authors are encouraged to make underlying data available for verification and further research, where appropriate. Transparency in data analysis, methodology, and reporting is vital to ensure reproducibility and trust in scientific findings.

✦ 8. Diversity and Inclusion

We are committed to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion across our editorial board, reviewer pool, and published content. Contributions from underrepresented regions and minority voices in nephrology research are welcomed and encouraged.

✉️ Contact Us

For questions about the editorial policy or to report concerns, please contact: editor.nephrology@sciconxjournals.com

The Journal of Nephrology is dedicated to fostering a trustworthy, inclusive, and globally impactful scholarly environment. Our editorial policy ensures that every submission is treated with respect, care, and academic rigor.