The Journal of Biomedical Science (JBS) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scientific publishing. Our peer review process ensures that only rigorous, ethical, and impactful research is accepted for publication. By adhering to a transparent and constructive review model, JBS provides a platform where scientific excellence and innovation can thrive.

1. Overview

Peer review is the cornerstone of academic publishing. At JBS, every manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process, meaning both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This ensures impartiality and fairness while maintaining a focus on the quality and validity of the research.

2. Stages of the Peer Review Process

2.1 Initial Editorial Screening

• Each submission is first reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief or an assigned Associate Editor.
• The manuscript is assessed for:
  • Relevance to the journal’s aims and scope.
  • Adherence to author guidelines and formatting requirements.
  • Originality and ethical compliance (including plagiarism screening).
• Manuscripts that do not meet basic requirements may be returned to authors without external review.

2.2 Reviewer Selection

• Suitable reviewers are identified based on their expertise, experience, and publication record.
• Each manuscript is typically sent to two or more independent reviewers.
• Reviewers are required to declare any conflicts of interest before accepting an assignment.

2.3 Review Process

• Reviewers evaluate manuscripts for:
  • Originality and novelty of the research.
  • Methodological rigor and reproducibility.
  • Scientific accuracy of results and interpretation.
  • Clarity and coherence of presentation.
  • Ethical standards in research design and reporting.
• Reviewers provide detailed reports with major and minor comments, along with a recommendation:
  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject

2.4 Editorial Decision

• The handling editor reviews the feedback and makes a decision in consultation with the Editor-in-Chief if necessary.
• Authors receive a decision letter summarizing reviewer comments and editorial recommendations.
• If revisions are requested, authors must address all reviewer feedback and provide a detailed response-to-reviewers document.

2.5 Revision and Re-Review

• Revised manuscripts are resubmitted through the system.
• Editors may return the revised manuscript to the original reviewers for further evaluation or make a decision directly if revisions are straightforward.
• This process may continue until the manuscript meets the journal’s standards.

2.6 Final Decision and Acceptance

• The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on acceptance.
• Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, typesetting, and proofing before online publication.

3. Timelines

The journal strives to ensure a fair yet efficient review process:

• Initial Decision: within 2-3 days
• Peer Review Completion: 14-21 days
• Final Decision Post-Revisions: 5-7 days
• Online Publication: within 7–10 days of acceptance

4. Ethical Standards in Peer Review

• JBS adheres to the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines for peer review.
• All reviewers and editors are expected to:
  • Maintain confidentiality of the review process.
  • Provide objective, constructive, and respectful feedback.
  • Declare any conflicts of interest.
  • Report suspected plagiarism, data manipulation, or ethical misconduct to the editor.

5. Transparency and Accountability

• JBS maintains a double-blind review to prevent bias.
• Authors are kept informed about the status of their manuscript at each stage.
• Post-publication, readers may raise concerns, which will be handled according to COPE guidelines.

6. Recognition of Reviewers

We value the contribution of our reviewers, who dedicate their expertise and time to advancing biomedical science. JBS acknowledges reviewers through:

• Annual reviewer recognition listings.
• Certificates of reviewing (upon request).
• Consideration for future editorial board membership.

The peer review process at the Journal of Biomedical Science is designed to be rigorous, fair, and transparent. By engaging expert reviewers and maintaining high ethical standards, JBS ensures that every article published contributes meaningfully to the advancement of biomedical research and healthcare innovation.