The SCICONX Journal of Advanced Materials & Engineering (JAME) upholds a rigorous, transparent, and ethically grounded peer-review system designed to ensure that every published manuscript meets the highest standards of scientific accuracy, methodological reliability, and disciplinary relevance. Our review workflow combines the strengths of expert evaluation, constructive communication, and editorial oversight to maintain academic integrity and enhance research quality.
JAME follows a double-blind peer review model, where both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process to eliminate potential biases and ensure fair and impartial assessment.
1. Initial Editorial Screening
Once a manuscript is submitted through the journal’s online system, it undergoes a preliminary evaluation conducted by the Editorial Office and the Editor-in-Chief. This stage includes:
Manuscripts that fail the initial screening may be returned to authors for revision or declined without external review.
2. Assignment to Section Editor
Manuscripts that pass the initial check are assigned to an Associate Editor / Section Editor with relevant subject expertise. The Section Editor is responsible for:
This ensures that submissions are handled by experts who understand the manuscript’s domain and technical depth.
3. Reviewer Selection and Invitation
The Section Editor invites two to three independent reviewers who possess expertise related to the manuscript’s core subject. Reviewer selection follows strict criteria:
Reviewers who accept the invitation are granted access to the anonymized manuscript and the detailed review guidelines.
4. Double-Blind Peer Review
JAME uses a double-blind system, ensuring that:
This approach reduces personal, institutional, and geographic bias.
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:
Reviewers provide:
5. Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer reports, the Section Editor formulates a recommendation for the Editor-in-Chief, who makes the final decision. Possible outcomes include:
A. Accept
The manuscript is ready for publication with minimal or no edits.
B. Minor Revision
Authors are asked to address small issues without re-review.
C. Major Revision
Substantial improvements are required; the revised manuscript undergoes a second round of peer review.
D. Reject
The manuscript is not suitable for publication, either due to major flaws or misalignment with the journal’s scope.
All decisions are supported by detailed feedback, ensuring transparency and fairness.
6. Revision and Resubmission
If revisions are required, authors must:
The editorial team may send major revisions back to the original reviewers to verify the adequacy of the improvements.
7. Final Acceptance and Technical Editing
Once accepted, the manuscript undergoes:
This ensures the final article meets professional publication standards.
8. Ethical Considerations
JAME follows strict ethical guidelines aligned with:
We maintain zero tolerance for plagiarism, data manipulation, duplicate submission, authorship misconduct, or conflicts of interest.
9. Estimated Timeline
While timelines may vary by manuscript type and reviewer availability, JAME strives to ensure:
Our goal is to conduct fast, fair, and high-quality peer review without compromising scientific scrutiny.
10. Commitment to Transparent and High-Quality Review
The SCICONX Journal of Advanced Materials & Engineering is committed to:
Through a balanced, ethical, and expert-driven review model, JAME ensures that every published article reflects excellence and contributes meaningfully to the advancement of materials and engineering research.